KINECTIC

Search
Skip to content
  • Practice Research
    • Practice Research Resources
  • Research Blog
  • Research Overview
    • Historical Context
    • Contemporary Research
    • Background
  • Performative Examples
    • Performance Reviews
  • The Kinect
    • Kinect Software
    • Motion Capture (Body)
    • Motion Capture (Face)
  • Centre for Doctoral Training
    • Internship
    • Conference paper
    • Research Writing
Research Blog

8. Evaluation Workshops

May 21, 2014 admin

In order to evaluate the effectiveness and to gain critical feedback of ‘iMorphia’ the prototype performance system, fourteen performers took part in a series of workshops which were carried out between the 14th and 18th April 2014 in the Mixed Reality Lab at Nottingham University.

One of the key observations was that content effects performative behaviour. This was originally posed as a research question in October 2013:

“Can the projected illusion affect the actor such that they feel embodied by the characteristics of the virtual character? ”

An interesting observation was the powerful and often liberating effect of changing the gender of male and female participants, producing comments such as “I feel quite powerful like this” (f->m), “I feel more sensual” (m->f).

All participants when in opposite gender expressed awareness of stereotypes, males not wanting to behave in what they perceived as a stereotypical fashion towards the female character, whilst females in male character seemed to relish the idea of playing with male stereotypes. These reactions reflect a contemporary post feminism society where the act of stereotyping females has strong political issues. A number of males reported how they felt that they had to respect the female character as if it had an independent life.

 One participant likened the effect of changing gender to the medieval ‘Festival of Fools’, where putting on clothes of the opposite gender is a foolish thing to do and gives permission to play the fool and to break rules, which was once regarded as a powerful and liberating thing to be able to do. This sentiment was echoed by a number of participants, that the system gave you freedom and permission to be other, other than ones normal everyday self and removed from people’s expectations of how one is supposed to behave.

In summary the key observations resulting from the workshops were:

i) The effectiveness of body projection in creating an embodied character that is sufficiently convincing and effective in creating a suspension of disbelief in both performer and audience.

ii) How system artefacts such as lag and glitches from tracking errors were exploited by performers to explore notions of the double and the uncanny.

iii) The affective response of the performer when in character compared to the objective response when viewing the projection as an audience member.

The video below contains short extracts from the four hours of recorded video, with text overlays of comments by the performers.

doubleembodimentgenderglitchesperformanceplayuncannyvisual feedbackworkshop

Post navigation

Previous Post7. Performance and Games WorkshopNext Post9. Evaluation Exercise – Two Performers

Tags

colocation daz 3d studio dixon double embodiment enactment face tracking gaming gender gesture glitches immersion improvisation interaction intermediality jo scott kinect lincoln live makehuman mikumiku mirroring navigation PaR participation performance performative research persective physics play popupplay practise praxis projection projection mapping props realism shana moulton speech tracking two performers uncanny unity visual feedback workshop

Performative Interaction and Embodiment on an Augmented Stage

Browse Research Blog

  • 22. iMorphia at the Festival of Fools Posted on: Apr 27th, 2017
  • 21. iMorphia Public Demonstration Posted on: Jun 23rd, 2016
  • 20. Colocation and the Oculus Rift Posted on: May 16th, 2016
  • 19. Interaction Workshop Posted on: Mar 8th, 2016
  • 18. Interactive Props and Physics Posted on: Dec 6th, 2015
  • 17. Interactive Props Posted on: Nov 10th, 2015
  • 16. Participation, Conversation, Collaboration Posted on: Oct 14th, 2015
  • 15. Navigation Posted on: Aug 7th, 2015
  • 14. Comparative Study Posted on: Jun 1st, 2015
  • 13. PopUpPlay Posted on: Mar 4th, 2015
  • 12. Live Performance Posted on: Feb 25th, 2015
  • 11. The Uncanny, Praxis and Intermediality Posted on: Feb 13th, 2015
  • 10. Fascinate, Evaluate and Praxis Posted on: Oct 29th, 2014
  • 9. Evaluation Exercise - Two Performers Posted on: Aug 12th, 2014
  • 8. Evaluation Workshops Posted on: May 21st, 2014
  • 7. Performance and Games Workshop Posted on: Mar 30th, 2014
  • 6. "User Testing" Posted on: Mar 17th, 2014
  • 5. Research Review: Theory and Practice Posted on: Feb 13th, 2014
  • 4. Kinect and Unity - Semi-realistic characters Posted on: Feb 9th, 2014
  • 3. Realism and The Uncanny Posted on: Feb 9th, 2014
  • 2. Unity 3D and Kinect tests Posted on: Jan 23rd, 2014
  • 1. MikuMorphia Posted on: Nov 15th, 2013

Featuring Top 22/22 of Research Blog

Subscribe

Read more

Proudly powered by WordPress